aestheticsurgeryvietnam

banner-12
banner mb

CUSTOMER IMAGES BEFORE AND AFTER TREATMENT

IMAGES BEFORE AND AFTER TREATMENT

Emily Carter
Facelift + necklift
Before treatment condition
  • Sagging of the neck, jawline, and brows after weight loss (brow ptosis)
  • Submental fullness and excess cervical fat (double chin).
  • Lax platysma with visible platysmal bands.
  • Upper eyelid skin excess causing a tired look (dermatochalasis).
  • Global facial skin laxity and loss of tone.
Post-treatment condition
  • Facial and neck soft tissues are undermined, tightened, and repositioned to reduce laxity, wrinkles, and redundant skin.
  • Crisper jawline with a natural V-line effect. Slimmer, more youthful facial contour.
  • Neck addressed comprehensively: excess skin removed and platysma tightened, yielding a thinner, smoother neck.
  • Upper eyelid excess skin excised. Incisions concealed in the natural crease, scars typically inconspicuous.
  • Eyes appear more open with a brighter, natural gaze.
  • Face looks firmer and younger, without the fatigued appearance from droopy lids or loose skin.
  • Comprehensive yet natural rejuvenation with harmonious results and no obvious surgical stigmata.
Sarah Thompson
Facelift + necklift + eyelid
Before treatment condition
  • Severe facial and cervical skin laxity, especially submental loss of elasticity.
  • Descent of lower-face soft tissues blunting the jawline.
  • Lax platysma with vertical banding.
  • Excess cervical and submental fat (double chin) causing heaviness.
  • Upper-eyelid dermatochalasis hooding the eyes, tired appearance.
  • Uneven skin tone with mild dullness.
  • Rough skin texture with enlarged pores.
  • Global loss of firmness and youthful contours.
Post-treatment condition
  • Face and neck elevated and tightened, laxity markedly reduced.
  • Jawline recontoured and defined, slimmer lower-face profile.
  • Neck smooth and taut with resolution of platysmal bands and vertical rhytids.
  • Excess cervical/submental fat reduced, improved cervicomental angle.
  • Upper lids refined: redundant skin excised; eyes appear brighter with natural depth.
  • More even, brighter complexion after adjunct laser treatment.
  • Smoother skin, tighter pores, improved elasticity.
  • Global rejuvenation with natural harmony; scars concealed and typically minimal.
David Miller
Facelift + eyelid
Before treatment condition
  • Global facial skin laxity, most evident in the midface and jawline (jowling).
  • Upper-eyelid dermatochalasis with hooding, heavy and tired gaze.
  • Lower-eyelid fine rhytids with dull, crepey skin and early photoaging.
  • Deep nasolabial folds creating a fatigued or stern resting expression.
  • Overall appearance older than stated age, reduced facial vitality.
Post-treatment condition
  • Facial soft tissues elevated, tightened, and redraped with marked reduction of laxity.
  • Upper lids refined: redundant skin excised, eyes appear wider and brighter; scars hidden in the crease.
  • Lower-eyelid skin smoother and more even in tone with visible reduction in fine lines.
  • Softer, more relaxed and approachable facial expression.
  • Pan-facial rejuvenation with natural harmony and inconspicuous surgical stigmata.
Linda Parker
Lower facelift + necklift
Before treatment condition
  • Marked laxity of the lower face and neck with loss of firmness.
  • Lax cervical and submandibular musculature (platysma) reducing structural support.
  • Blunted, poorly defined jawline with a heavy, aged appearance.
  • Horizontal neck lines and dynamic vertical platysmal banding.
  • Overall reduced tone and vitality, appearance older than stated age.
Post-treatment condition
  • Lower face and neck tightened with resolution of sagging.
  • Platysma and lower-face support tightened and secured in proper anatomic position, restoring natural firmness.
  • Sharper, slimmer jawline for a lighter, more refined facial contour.
  • Smoother neck with diminished folds and no visible platysmal bands.
  • Youthful, soft result that remains natural, without a “pulled” look.
Rebecca Moore
Facelift + eyelid + browlift
Before treatment condition
  • Sagging in the jawline and cheeks with loss of firmness.
  • Mild brow ptosis, narrowing the forehead and producing a tired look.
  • Upper-eyelid skin excess (dermatochalasis) causing fatigued appearance.
  • Thin lips with reduced volume and peri-oral imbalance.
  • Uneven skin tone with signs of photoaging and dullness.
  • Resting facial expression appears older than stated age.
Post-treatment condition
  • Midface and jawline lifted and refined; contour slimmer and more defined.
  • Brows elevated to a natural position, opening the forehead–eye complex.
  • Upper lids refined; redundant skin removed; gaze brighter and more agile.
  • Lips appear fuller and more proportionate to the mouth and overall face.
  • Smoother, more even, healthier-looking skin after CO₂ laser resurfacing.
  • Global rejuvenation with a fresh, natural expression.
Le Phuong Uyen
Eyelid + keloid scar excision
Before treatment condition
  • Subtle or absent upper-lid crease (hidden crease).
  • Mild upper-lid droop (mild ptosis).
  • Possible excess upper-lid skin (dermatochalasis).
Post-treatment condition
  • wo well-defined, symmetric double eyelids; crease height balanced.
  • Brighter, more expressive gaze.
  • Periorbital shape harmonizes with overall facial proportions.
  • No significant bruising or swelling; fine aesthetic suturing with incision concealed in the natural crease.
Olya
Upper and lower eyelids
Before treatment condition
  • Upper lid: Mild excess skin (dermatochalasis). Crease indistinct with poor definition.
  • Lower lid: Small fat prolapse (steatoblepharon) and a mildly deep tear trough, producing a tired look.
  • Overall: Gaze underdefined, reduced vitality.
Post-treatment condition
  • Upper lid: Well-defined, symmetric crease with a soft, natural contour.
  • Lower lid: Marked reduction of fat prolapse and tear-trough depth, brighter and more youthful infraorbital area.
  • Overall: Brighter face with a more open, refreshed gaze.
  • Minimal edema or ecchymosis; recovery progressing well.
Tran Gia Han
Eyelid + keloid scar excision
Before treatment condition
  • Single eyelid with an indistinct crease; mild upper-lid droop.
  • Tired, low-vitality gaze.
  • History of facial keloid; cosmetic removal requested.
Post-treatment condition
  • Clear, symmetric, natural double eyelids; harmonious periocular shape.
  • Wider eye opening with a brighter, more agile gaze.
  • Keloid area neatly excised; no coarse scar visible in images.
  • No significant swelling; recovery stable; peri-lid skin healing well.
Winny
Eyelid + keloid scar excision
Before treatment condition
  • Monolid without a defined crease, gaze appears dull.
  • Asymmetric upper lids with mild ptosis causing partial hooding.
  • Tired facial look despite young age.
  • No significant comorbidities; suitable for a gentle blepharoplasty technique.
Post-treatment condition
  • Well-defined, soft double eyelids, symmetric bilaterally.
  • Wider palpebral fissure and better lid contour; brighter, more engaging gaze.
  • Crease at a moderate height, no retraction; scars concealed in the natural fold.
  • Improved facial harmony across the eye–nose–chin proportions.
Nguyen Ngoc Bao Tran
Eyelid
Before treatment condition
  • Monolid without a defined supratarsal crease.
  • Thick upper-lid skin/soft tissue with partial pupillary hooding in primary gaze (mild ptosis/pseudoptosis).
  • Downturned, low-energy gaze.
  • Periorbital region lacks definition, face appears heavy.
  • Good candidate for a Phoenix-style design to widen the palpebral aperture and reshape the crease.
Post-treatment condition
  • Phoenix-style crease with subtle lateral extension; sharper eye shape.
  • Crease height moderate, well defined, smooth, and symmetric with the face.
  • Fine incision with concealed scar; no significant edema or ecchymosis.
  • Brighter, wider, more alert gaze.
  • Improved facial balance with effective periocular rejuvenation.
Lu Ngoc Sinh
Structural rhinoplasty with Surgiform
Before treatment condition
  • Low dorsum; flat nasal bridge.
  • Short, slightly upturned tip; limited projection.
  • Poorly defined nasofrontal angle; weak harmony across forehead–nose–lip–chin.
  • Profile lacks a focal point.
  • No prior nasal surgery.
Post-treatment condition
  • Slender, natural dorsal augmentation without implant show.
  • Tip lengthened and supported with cartilage grafts (auricular) and structural grafting; dorsal refined with Surgiform ePTFE.
  • Balanced nasofrontal angle and smooth dorsal lines; “golden-ratio” side profile.
  • Softer, more refined facial profile, especially on lateral view.
Mai An
Structural rhinoplasty with Surgiform
Before treatment condition
  • Low nasal dorsum; short tip with limited projection; disharmony with forehead and chin.
  • Blunted nasofrontal angle; lateral profile lacks definition.
  • Bulbous tip lacking finesse for feminine facial proportions.
Post-treatment condition
  • Higher, slender dorsum with a smooth, natural contour.
  • Tip narrowed and projected, creating a structural S-Line shape.
  • Sharper, balanced lateral profile across nose–lip–chin.
  • More refined overall facial appearance.
Nguyen Trong Nhan
Structural rhinoplasty with US “Nano” implant
Before treatment condition
  • Low, poorly defined nasal dorsum.
  • Bulbous, under-projected tip lacking shape.
  • Mildly wide alar base, reducing nasal refinement.
  • Weak facial focal point and disharmony.
  • Dorsum nearly coplanar with the face, limited depth.
  • Blunted radix–nasal junction (nasofrontal transition).
Post-treatment condition
  • Higher, straight dorsal line from radix to tip for a clean profile.
  • Tip subtly elevated and refined with a soft S-curve.
  • Alar base narrowed for balanced nasal width.
  • Clear improvement in overall facial harmony and masculine definition.
  • Smooth nasofrontal transition, natural S-line aesthetic.
  • Smooth nasofrontal transition, natural S-line aesthetic.
  • Nose appears higher yet soft, without a stiff or overdone look.
Vo Hoai Bao Nghi
Structural rhinoplasty with US “Nano” implant
Before treatment condition
  • Low nasal dorsum; short tip; broad, horizontally wide nose.
  • Disrupted dorsal line on profile with poor forehead–nose–chin alignment.
  • Bulbous tip with inadequate height and projection.
  • Frontal view lacks a focal point; nasal width diminishes facial refinement.
Post-treatment condition
  • Dorsum elevated with a smooth, natural contour and no implant show.
  • Tip reconstructed, lengthened, and narrowed; transverse flare corrected.
  • Improved nose–lip–chin balance, especially on the lateral profile.
  • Overall face appears lighter, more harmonious, and refined.
Jang Nguyen
Structural rhinoplasty with US “Nano” implant
Before treatment condition
  • Low, flat dorsum with mild saddle; limited projection and depth.
  • Bulbous, poorly defined tip due to weak lower lateral cartilages.
  • Mild alar flare with visible, wide nostrils on profile; base imbalance.
  • Face lacks a focal point because of the low bridge.
Post-treatment condition
  • Dorsum elevated to a slender, harmonious height using a Nano implant plus autologous grafts, creating a smooth, natural S-line in frontal and lateral views.
  • Tip structurally rebuilt with septal/auricular cartilage: smaller, longer, and better projected with soft definition; reduced risk of implant show or tip redness.
  • Alar base refined; nostrils shaped into a symmetric teardrop/almond form; horizontal flare reduced.
  • Overall facial harmony improved; features appear more defined and elegant.
Trinh Kieu
Ergonomix breast augmentation + Grade I mastopexy + areolar reduction + nipple reduction
Before treatment condition
  • Grade I breast ptosis: nipples mildly descended relative to the inframammary fold; early sagging.
  • Hypomastia: limited glandular tissue and upper-pole fullness, imbalance with shoulders and waist.
  • Enlarged areolae and prominent nipples, disproportionate to breast mound.
  • Insufficient anterior projection on profile; weak, droopy contour.
Post-treatment condition
  • Augmentation with Ergonomix implants (soft, dynamic gel) for fuller, balanced, natural-feeling breasts.
  • Nipple–areola complex repositioned to the central axis; height and symmetry corrected.
  • Areolar and nipple reduction to aesthetic proportions for a youthful, harmonious look.
  • Restored natural C-curve on lateral view with a fuller lower pole and smooth upper-to-lower transition.
  • No implant show; incisions concealed at the periareolar border; minimal disturbance of glandular tissue.
Mo
Ergonomix breast augmentation
Before treatment condition
  • Small breasts with hypoplastic glandular and fatty tissue; flat upper torso; imbalance across bust–waist–shoulders.
  • Wide intermammary distance with poorly defined cleavage.
  • Mild breast asymmetry in size or height.
  • Nipples slightly off the central breast axis on frontal view.
Post-treatment condition
  • Fuller, naturally round breasts in proportion to body habitus.
  • Defined, attractive cleavage with reduced intermammary gap.
  • Improved left–right symmetry through surgical adjustment.
  • Nipples realigned to the correct axis for bilateral symmetry.
  • No implant show; discreet, aesthetic incisions with proper implant placement.
Laura Bennett
Ergonomix breast augmentation + Grade I mastopexy + areolar–nipple reshaping
Before treatment condition
  • Grade I ptosis: nipples slightly below the inframammary fold; early sagging.
  • Hypomastia: limited glandular tissue and soft-tissue envelope; bust disproportionate to shoulder–waist frame.
  • Areolar enlargement with nipple hypertrophy; disproportionate to breast mound.
  • Insufficient anterior projection and cleavage; absent aesthetic C-curve.
Post-treatment condition
  • Fuller, soft, natural contour with Ergonomix implants (moderate projection, dynamic gel).
  • Nipples recentred on the breast meridian; height and symmetry corrected.
  • Areola and nipple reduced to aesthetic proportions for a youthful, balanced look.
  • Defined C-curve on lateral view with a fuller lower pole.
  • No implant show or “double-bubble”; periareolar scars concealed, minimal glandular disruption.
Emily Collins
Breast augmentation with lift (augmentation–mastopexy)
Before treatment condition
  • Moderate–severe ptosis, Grade II–III, in a 22-year-old with glandular laxity; breasts appear aged.
  • Loss of upper-pole volume and projection.
  • Aesthetic goal: higher, fuller, youthful breasts that remain natural, not rigid.
Post-treatment condition
  • Elevation, firmness, and fullness restored: laser-assisted mastopexy plus 250 cc implants yields round, balanced contour with improved upper-pole fullness.
  • Internal support created: laser induces durable fibrous support (“internal bra”) to help maintain shape and limit recurrent ptosis.
  • Youthful, natural profile: soft roundness, appropriate projection, no overdone look.
  • Less tissue trauma, faster recovery: laser enables precise dissection with typically less bruising and pain.
Olivia Cooper
Ergonomix breast augmentation with asymmetry correction
Before treatment condition
  • Small breasts with limited fullness (approx. 34A).
  • Noticeable asymmetry: left breast sits lower than the right.
  • Aesthetic goal: reach 34C. Fuller, symmetric, natural, and soft.
Post-treatment condition
  • Volume restored with 354 cc Ergonomix implants. Target size 34C achieved.
  • Asymmetry corrected: implants placed submuscular via periareolar incisions. Heights and contours balanced.
  • Soft, natural feel maintained with under-muscle placement. Scars concealed at the areolar border.
  • Durable result at 2 years: stable shape and symmetry. No displacement.
Nguyen Thi Anh Nguyet
Liposuction + abdominoplasty with back contouring
Before treatment condition
  • Thick abdominal fat with lax skin; waist 80–100 cm. Fat concentrated in the anterior abdomen and flanks. Poor abdominal wall tone. Loss of waist definition.
  • Upper and lower back lipodystrophy with discrete bulges, blunting the natural S-curve.
  • Disproportionate torso despite non-obese weight; poor abdomen–waist–back delineation.
Post-treatment condition
  • Flatter abdomen and tighter waist after lipoabdominoplasty; redundant skin addressed and waistline re-created.
  • Reduced back fat with smoother thoracolumbar and flank contours; S-curve restored.
  • More balanced “hourglass” proportions across waist and hips; slimmer overall look.
Tran Thuy Trang
Liposuction of upper & lower abdomen + flanks with autologous buttock fat grafting
Before treatment condition
  • Localized fat in upper abdomen, lower abdomen, and flanks.
  • Poor waist definition; wide, flat abdominal silhouette.
  • Weak waist–hip curve; no hourglass contour.
  • Mild gluteal volume deficiency; buttocks slightly flat relative to upper torso.
Post-treatment condition
  • Abdomen evenly debulked and flatter; infra-umbilical bulge resolved.
  • Waist narrowed with a clear lateral contour.
  • Smooth abdominal surface without contour irregularities on review.
  • Buttocks augmented with purified autologous fat, fuller and proportionate to waist and back.
  • Small access incisions closed neatly; sutures removed; recovery progressing normally.
Mai Thi Nhi
Upper-arm liposuction + tummy tuck
Before treatment condition
  • Significant fat in upper abdomen, lower abdomen, and back/flanks.
  • Abdominal wall laxity/widening.
  • Mild skin laxity with reduced tone and poor waist definition.
  • Localized fat along the upper and lower arms.
  • No clear muscle contour; arms appear bulky and heavy.
  • Hard to wear fitted sleeves; redundant skin shows with movement.
Post-treatment condition
  • Noticeably flatter abdomen with a smaller waist; slimmer torso.
  • Smoother, more harmonious waist–hip curve.
  • Skin surface tighter and even, without folds or irregularities.
  • Clean incisions with sutures removed; healing well, no seroma or significant bruising.
  • Even debulking bilaterally; slimmer, elongated arm contour with clear definition.
  • Heavy appearance resolved on frontal and lateral views.
  • Small, discreet access sites; cosmetic impact minimal.
  • Recovery stable after liposuction and suture removal; no complications observed.
Patricia Holmes
Body-contouring liposuction — abdomen, waist, back, hips, inner thighs
Before treatment condition
  • Generalized fat across abdomen, flanks, hips, and lower back; no defined curves.
  • Abdominal skin laxity with horizontal folds when upright.
  • Deep back rolls segmenting the posterior trunk.
  • Excess medial-thigh fat enlarging upper legs and disrupting limb balance.
  • Global loss of tone; older appearance; difficult to wear fitted garments.
Post-treatment condition
  • Abdomen flattened with a newly defined contour; large skin folds eliminated.
  • Waist notably reduced, creating a clear hourglass silhouette.
  • Back fat debulked; rolls resolved; no lateral bulges.
  • Abdominoplasty scar discreet and well placed, complementing the waist–hip line.
  • Inner thighs slimmer; legs appear longer and better proportioned.
  • Overall figure more youthful and firm; easier to wear body-hugging clothing or swimwear.
Katherine Lewis
Liposuction — abdomen, waist, back, hips, and inner thighs
Before treatment condition
  • Generalized fat deposition in the abdomen, flanks, hips, and lower back; weak body curves.
  • Abdominal skin laxity with horizontal folds in upright posture.
  • Deep dorsal back rolls segmenting the back.
  • Excess medial-thigh fat causing bulky upper legs and poor limb balance.
  • Global loss of tone, older appearance, difficulty wearing fitted garments.
Post-treatment condition
  • Abdomen flattened and tightened; abdominal contour redefined.
  • Waist noticeably reduced with a clear hourglass silhouette.
  • Back rolls eliminated; posterior trunk smooth without lateral bulges.
  • Abdominal contouring incision discreet and well placed, supporting the waist–hip line.
  • Inner thighs slimmer; legs appear longer and better proportioned.
  • Overall figure more youthful and firm; easier fit for body-hugging clothing and swimwear.
James Peterson
Hair Transplant
Before treatment condition
  • High forehead with shiny bald scalp.
  • Deep temporal recession; widened U-shaped frontal hairline.
  • No hair across mid-scalp and vertex.
  • Scalp fully visible with absent coverage.
  • Frontal hairline receded in an M-pattern extending toward the crown.
  • Vertex completely bald; mid-scalp denuded.
  • Only a thin occipital–parietal rim of donor hair remains.
Post-treatment condition
  • Dense, even coverage from hairline to crown with no scalp show.
  • Natural arched hairline design. Not overly square, yet retains masculine character.
  • Proportions balanced with the face; more youthful appearance.
  • High, uniform density from front to back without gaps.
  • Natural lift and growth direction; indistinguishable from native hair.
  • Seamless match to existing hair in color and texture.
  • Soft yet thick, strong shafts, indicating excellent technique and near-complete graft survival.
Thomas Reed
Hair Transplant
Before treatment condition
  • Male-pattern hair loss, Norwood III–IV.
  • Receded frontal hairline with a high forehead; deep temporal recession.
  • Vertex with visible scalp; remaining hairs are thin and miniaturized.
  • Overall appearance older than stated age by ~7–10 years.
  • Top-down view shows an empty crown swirl.
Post-treatment condition
  • Dense, even coverage at the hairline and crown.
  • Soft, natural hairline design that suits the face; not overly square.
  • Complete coverage of all bald areas, including the crown, indicating high graft survival.
  • Direction and color match native hair; transplant is virtually undetectable.
  • Improved facial balance with a younger, more polished look.
Robert Hayes
Hair Transplant
Before treatment condition
  • Advanced androgenetic alopecia: extensive loss at frontal scalp and vertex; hairline nearly absent.
  • Residual hair density very low, concentrated along the temporal–parietal rim.
  • Absent frontal frame elongates the face and ages the appearance.
Post-treatment condition
  • Frontal hairline reconstructed with a soft, masculine curve; even density without a rigid straight edge.
  • Vertex fully covered; no scalp show under direct light.
  • Uniform density without patchy areas.
  • Clear aesthetic gain: younger look and better facial balance with a defined hairline.
  • Graft growth follows natural direction and swirl; no upright or chaotic shafts.
William Grant
Hair Transplant
Before treatment condition
  • Prior transplant: ~2,400 grafts to the frontal scalp at another clinic.
  • Graft mix: ~2,000 scalp grafts + ~400 beard grafts.
  • Mid-frontal beard-graft zone with poor survival, minimal growth.
  • Large interfollicular gaps and low density; unnatural appearance.
  • Patient dissatisfied and requests corrective work.
Post-treatment condition
  • Frontal zone fully covered with even, natural density.
  • Failed frontal work corrected; no visible gaps or step-offs.
  • New grafts show robust growth with proper direction and angulation; no kinked or upright hairs.
  • Hairline redesigned with balanced, sex-appropriate contour for the face.
  • Uniform cosmetic density achieved by 12–13 months.
Steven Harris
Hair Transplant
Before treatment condition
  • Advanced androgenetic alopecia with near-total loss at the frontal, mid-scalp, and vertex.
  • Residual density very sparse, limited to temporal rims and occipital donor zone.
  • Shiny scalp surface, consistent with long-standing baldness and high graft requirement for coverage.
Post-treatment condition
  • Dense, even coverage; hairline soft and natural, not overly square.
  • Full coverage including the crown, indicating high graft survival.
  • Implanted hair matches native hair in color and growth direction, evidencing precise technique.

Customer Reviews

4.8
⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐
Google
Ethan Lee Ethan Lee
Visiting Aestheticsurgery was such a wonderful experience. Every detail, from the ambiance to the treatment, was perfect. I couldn’t be happier with my choice!
Thomas Thomas
I’ve tried many spas before, but Aestheticsurgery stands out! The service is impeccable, and the staff genuinely care about your experience. I’m so glad I found them.
Nancy Cly Nancy Cly
I can’t recommend Aestheticsurgery enough! The staff are so professional and caring. I’ve never had such a relaxing and satisfying spa experience anywhere else!
Jurairat Molina Jurairat Molina
Aestheticsurgery truly exceeded my expectations. The team made me feel comfortable and pampered from start to finish. I’m thrilled I chose them!

Doctor

Cosmetic Surgery Doctor – Seoul Center

DR. BUI LE QUY TUNG

  • Experience: 6+ years in aesthetic surgery
  • Procedures performed: Over 6,000 successful cosmetic surgeries
  • Graduated in Cosmetic Surgery: Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
  • Certificate in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Orientation: Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine
DR. BUI LE QUY TUNG

Head of Aesthetic Surgery Department – Seoul Center

DR. NGUYEN KIM KHOA

  • Experience: Over 12 years in the cosmetic surgery field
  • Specialty: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery & Dermatology
  • Specialist Level II in Dermatology
  • Hanoi Medical University
  • Continuing Medical Education (CME) Certificates: Dermatology Hospital
DR. NGUYEN KIM KHOA