aestheticsurgeryvietnam

banner-12
banner mb

CUSTOMER IMAGES BEFORE AND AFTER TREATMENT

IMAGES BEFORE AND AFTER TREATMENT

Emily Carter
Facelift + necklift
- Sagging of the neck, jawline, and brows after weight loss (brow ptosis). - Submental fullness and excess cervical fat (double chin). - Lax platysma with visible platysmal bands. - Upper eyelid skin excess causing a tired look (dermatochalasis). - Global facial skin laxity and loss of tone.
- Facial and neck soft tissues are undermined, tightened, and repositioned to reduce laxity, wrinkles, and redundant skin. - Crisper jawline with a natural V-line effect. Slimmer, more youthful facial contour. - Neck addressed comprehensively: excess skin removed and platysma tightened, yielding a thinner, smoother neck. - Upper eyelid excess skin excised. Incisions concealed in the natural crease, scars typically inconspicuous. - Eyes appear more open with a brighter, natural gaze. - Face looks firmer and younger, without the fatigued appearance from droopy lids or loose skin. - Comprehensive yet natural rejuvenation with harmonious results and no obvious surgical stigmata.
Sarah Thompson
Facelift + necklift + eyelid
- Severe facial and cervical skin laxity, especially submental loss of elasticity. - Descent of lower-face soft tissues blunting the jawline. - Lax platysma with vertical banding. - Excess cervical and submental fat (double chin) causing heaviness. - Upper-eyelid dermatochalasis hooding the eyes, tired appearance. - Uneven skin tone with mild dullness. - Rough skin texture with enlarged pores. - Global loss of firmness and youthful contours.
- Face and neck elevated and tightened, laxity markedly reduced. - Jawline recontoured and defined, slimmer lower-face profile. - Neck smooth and taut with resolution of platysmal bands and vertical rhytids. - Excess cervical/submental fat reduced, improved cervicomental angle. - Upper lids refined: redundant skin excised; eyes appear brighter with natural depth. - More even, brighter complexion after adjunct laser treatment. - Smoother skin, tighter pores, improved elasticity. - Global rejuvenation with natural harmony; scars concealed and typically minimal.
David Miller
Facelift + eyelid
- Global facial skin laxity, most evident in the midface and jawline (jowling). - Upper-eyelid dermatochalasis with hooding, heavy and tired gaze. - Lower-eyelid fine rhytids with dull, crepey skin and early photoaging. - Deep nasolabial folds creating a fatigued or stern resting expression. - Overall appearance older than stated age, reduced facial vitality.
- Facial soft tissues elevated, tightened, and redraped with marked reduction of laxity. - Upper lids refined: redundant skin excised, eyes appear wider and brighter; scars hidden in the crease. - Lower-eyelid skin smoother and more even in tone with visible reduction in fine lines. - Softer, more relaxed and approachable facial expression. -Pan-facial rejuvenation with natural harmony and inconspicuous surgical stigmata.
Linda Parker
Lower facelift + necklift
- Marked laxity of the lower face and neck with loss of firmness. - Lax cervical and submandibular musculature (platysma) reducing structural support. - Blunted, poorly defined jawline with a heavy, aged appearance. - Horizontal neck lines and dynamic vertical platysmal banding. - Overall reduced tone and vitality, appearance older than stated age.
- Lower face and neck tightened with resolution of sagging. - Platysma and lower-face support tightened and secured in proper anatomic position, restoring natural firmness. - Sharper, slimmer jawline for a lighter, more refined facial contour. - Smoother neck with diminished folds and no visible platysmal bands. - Youthful, soft result that remains natural, without a “pulled” look.
Rebecca Moore
Facelift + eyelid + browlift
- Sagging in the jawline and cheeks with loss of firmness. - Mild brow ptosis, narrowing the forehead and producing a tired look. - Upper-eyelid skin excess (dermatochalasis) causing fatigued appearance. - Thin lips with reduced volume and peri-oral imbalance. - Uneven skin tone with signs of photoaging and dullness. - Resting facial expression appears older than stated age.
- Midface and jawline lifted and refined; contour slimmer and more defined. - Brows elevated to a natural position, opening the forehead–eye complex. - Upper lids refined; redundant skin removed; gaze brighter and more agile. - Lips appear fuller and more proportionate to the mouth and overall face. - Smoother, more even, healthier-looking skin after CO₂ laser resurfacing. - Global rejuvenation with a fresh, natural expression.
Le Phuong Uyen
Eyelid + keloid scar excision
- Subtle or absent upper-lid crease (hidden crease). - Mild upper-lid droop (mild ptosis). - Possible excess upper-lid skin (dermatochalasis).
- Wo well-defined, symmetric double eyelids; crease height balanced. - Brighter, more expressive gaze. - Periorbital shape harmonizes with overall facial proportions. - No significant bruising or swelling; fine aesthetic suturing with incision concealed in the natural crease.
Olya
Upper and lower eyelids
- Upper lid: Mild excess skin (dermatochalasis). Crease indistinct with poor definition. -Lower lid: Small fat prolapse (steatoblepharon) and a mildly deep tear trough, producing a tired look. - Overall: Gaze underdefined, reduced vitality.
- Upper lid: Well-defined, symmetric crease with a soft, natural contour. - Lower lid: Marked reduction of fat prolapse and tear-trough depth, brighter and more youthful infraorbital area. - Overall: Brighter face with a more open, refreshed gaze. - Minimal edema or ecchymosis; recovery progressing well.
Tran Gia Han
Eyelid + keloid scar excision
- Single eyelid with an indistinct crease; mild upper-lid droop. - Tired, low-vitality gaze. - History of facial keloid; cosmetic removal requested.
- Clear, symmetric, natural double eyelids; harmonious periocular shape. - Wider eye opening with a brighter, more agile gaze. - Keloid area neatly excised; no coarse scar visible in images. - No significant swelling; recovery stable; peri-lid skin healing well.
Winny
Eyelid + keloid scar excision
- Monolid without a defined crease, gaze appears dull. - Asymmetric upper lids with mild ptosis causing partial hooding. - Tired facial look despite young age. - No significant comorbidities; suitable for a gentle blepharoplasty technique.
- Well-defined, soft double eyelids, symmetric bilaterally. - Wider palpebral fissure and better lid contour; brighter, more engaging gaze. - Crease at a moderate height, no retraction; scars concealed in the natural fold. - Improved facial harmony across the eye–nose–chin proportions.
Nguyen Ngoc Bao Tran
Eyelid
- Monolid without a defined supratarsal crease. - Thick upper-lid skin/soft tissue with partial pupillary hooding in primary gaze (mild ptosis/pseudoptosis). - Downturned, low-energy gaze. - Periorbital region lacks definition, face appears heavy. - Good candidate for a Phoenix-style design to widen the palpebral aperture and reshape the crease.
- Phoenix-style crease with subtle lateral extension; sharper eye shape. - Crease height moderate, well defined, smooth, and symmetric with the face. - Fine incision with concealed scar; no significant edema or ecchymosis. - Brighter, wider, more alert gaze. - Improved facial balance with effective periocular rejuvenation.
Lu Ngoc Sinh
Structural rhinoplasty with Surgiform
- Low dorsum; flat nasal bridge. - Short, slightly upturned tip; limited projection. - Poorly defined nasofrontal angle; weak harmony across forehead–nose–lip–chin. - Profile lacks a focal point. - No prior nasal surgery.
- Slender, natural dorsal augmentation without implant show. - Tip lengthened and supported with cartilage grafts (auricular) and structural grafting; dorsal refined with Surgiform ePTFE. - Balanced nasofrontal angle and smooth dorsal lines; “golden-ratio” side profile. - Softer, more refined facial profile, especially on lateral view.
Mai An
Structural rhinoplasty with Surgiform
- Low nasal dorsum; short tip with limited projection; disharmony with forehead and chin. - Blunted nasofrontal angle; lateral profile lacks definition. - Bulbous tip lacking finesse for feminine facial proportions.
- Higher, slender dorsum with a smooth, natural contour. - Tip narrowed and projected, creating a structural S-Line shape. - Sharper, balanced lateral profile across nose–lip–chin. - More refined overall facial appearance.
Nguyen Trong Nhan
Structural rhinoplasty with US “Nano” implant
- Low, poorly defined nasal dorsum. - Bulbous, under-projected tip lacking shape. - Mildly wide alar base, reducing nasal refinement. - Weak facial focal point and disharmony. - Dorsum nearly coplanar with the face, limited depth. - Blunted radix–nasal junction (nasofrontal transition).
- Higher, straight dorsal line from radix to tip for a clean profile. - Tip subtly elevated and refined with a soft S-curve. - Alar base narrowed for balanced nasal width. - Clear improvement in overall facial harmony and masculine definition. - Smooth nasofrontal transition, natural S-line aesthetic. - Appropriate tip projection without over-rotation or excessive curvature. - Nose appears higher yet soft, without a stiff or overdone look.
Vo Hoai Bao Nghi
Structural rhinoplasty with US “Nano” implant
- Low nasal dorsum; short tip; broad, horizontally wide nose. - Disrupted dorsal line on profile with poor forehead–nose–chin alignment. - Bulbous tip with inadequate height and projection. - Frontal view lacks a focal point; nasal width diminishes facial refinement.
- Dorsum elevated with a smooth, natural contour and no implant show. - Tip reconstructed, lengthened, and narrowed; transverse flare corrected. - Improved nose–lip–chin balance, especially on the lateral profile. - Overall face appears lighter, more harmonious, and refined.
Jang Nguyen
Structural rhinoplasty with US “Nano” implant
- Low, flat dorsum with mild saddle; limited projection and depth. - Bulbous, poorly defined tip due to weak lower lateral cartilages. - Mild alar flare with visible, wide nostrils on profile; base imbalance. - Face lacks a focal point because of the low bridge.
- Dorsum elevated to a slender, harmonious height using a Nano implant plus autologous grafts, creating a smooth, natural S-line in frontal and lateral views. - Tip structurally rebuilt with septal/auricular cartilage: smaller, longer, and better projected with soft definition; reduced risk of implant show or tip redness. - Alar base refined; nostrils shaped into a symmetric teardrop/almond form; horizontal flare reduced. - Overall facial harmony improved; features appear more defined and elegant.
Trinh Kieu
Ergonomix breast augmentation + Grade I mastopexy + areolar reduction + nipple reduction
- Grade I breast ptosis: nipples mildly descended relative to the inframammary fold; early sagging. - Hypomastia: limited glandular tissue and upper-pole fullness, imbalance with shoulders and waist. - Enlarged areolae and prominent nipples, disproportionate to breast mound. - Insufficient anterior projection on profile; weak, droopy contour.
- Augmentation with Ergonomix implants (soft, dynamic gel) for fuller, balanced, natural-feeling breasts. - Nipple–areola complex repositioned to the central axis; height and symmetry corrected. - Areolar and nipple reduction to aesthetic proportions for a youthful, harmonious look. - Restored natural C-curve on lateral view with a fuller lower pole and smooth upper-to-lower transition. - No implant show; incisions concealed at the periareolar border; minimal disturbance of glandular tissue.
Mo
Ergonomix breast augmentation
- Small breasts with hypoplastic glandular and fatty tissue; flat upper torso; imbalance across bust–waist–shoulders. - Wide intermammary distance with poorly defined cleavage. - Mild breast asymmetry in size or height. - Nipples slightly off the central breast axis on frontal view.
- Fuller, naturally round breasts in proportion to body habitus. - Defined, attractive cleavage with reduced intermammary gap. - Improved left–right symmetry through surgical adjustment. - Nipples realigned to the correct axis for bilateral symmetry. - No implant show; discreet, aesthetic incisions with proper implant placement.
Laura Bennett
Ergonomix breast augmentation + Grade I mastopexy + areolar–nipple reshaping
- Grade I ptosis: nipples slightly below the inframammary fold; early sagging. - Hypomastia: limited glandular tissue and soft-tissue envelope; bust disproportionate to shoulder–waist frame. - Areolar enlargement with nipple hypertrophy; disproportionate to breast mound. - Insufficient anterior projection and cleavage; absent aesthetic C-curve.
- Fuller, soft, natural contour with Ergonomix implants (moderate projection, dynamic gel). - Nipples recentred on the breast meridian; height and symmetry corrected. - Areola and nipple reduced to aesthetic proportions for a youthful, balanced look. - Defined C-curve on lateral view with a fuller lower pole. - No implant show or “double-bubble”; periareolar scars concealed, minimal glandular disruption.
Emily Collins
Breast augmentation with lift (augmentation–mastopexy)
- Moderate–severe ptosis, Grade II–III, in a 22-year-old with glandular laxity; breasts appear aged. - Loss of upper-pole volume and projection. - Aesthetic goal: higher, fuller, youthful breasts that remain natural, not rigid.
- Elevation, firmness, and fullness restored: laser-assisted mastopexy plus 250 cc implants yields round, balanced contour with improved upper-pole fullness. - Internal support created: laser induces durable fibrous support (“internal bra”) to help maintain shape and limit recurrent ptosis. - Youthful, natural profile: soft roundness, appropriate projection, no overdone look. - Less tissue trauma, faster recovery: laser enables precise dissection with typically less bruising and pain.
Olivia Cooper
Ergonomix breast augmentation with asymmetry correction
- Small breasts with limited fullness (approx. 34A). - Noticeable asymmetry: left breast sits lower than the right. - Aesthetic goal: reach 34C. Fuller, symmetric, natural, and soft.
- Volume restored with 354 cc Ergonomix implants. Target size 34C achieved. - Asymmetry corrected: implants placed submuscular via periareolar incisions. Heights and contours balanced. - Soft, natural feel maintained with under-muscle placement. Scars concealed at the areolar border. - Durable result at 2 years: stable shape and symmetry. No displacement.
Nguyen Thi Anh Nguyet
Liposuction + abdominoplasty with back contouring
- Thick abdominal fat with lax skin; waist 80–100 cm. Fat concentrated in the anterior abdomen and flanks. Poor abdominal wall tone. Loss of waist definition. - Upper and lower back lipodystrophy with discrete bulges, blunting the natural S-curve. - Disproportionate torso despite non-obese weight; poor abdomen–waist–back delineation.
- Flatter abdomen and tighter waist after lipoabdominoplasty; redundant skin addressed and waistline re-created. - Reduced back fat with smoother thoracolumbar and flank contours; S-curve restored. - More balanced “hourglass” proportions across waist and hips; slimmer overall look.
Tran Thuy Trang
Liposuction of upper & lower abdomen + flanks with autologous buttock fat grafting
- Localized fat in upper abdomen, lower abdomen, and flanks. - Poor waist definition; wide, flat abdominal silhouette. - Weak waist–hip curve; no hourglass contour. - Mild gluteal volume deficiency; buttocks slightly flat relative to upper torso.-
- Abdomen evenly debulked and flatter; infra-umbilical bulge resolved. - Waist narrowed with a clear lateral contour. - Smooth abdominal surface without contour irregularities on review. - Buttocks augmented with purified autologous fat, fuller and proportionate to waist and back. - Small access incisions closed neatly; sutures removed; recovery progressing normally.
Mai Thi Nhi
Upper-arm liposuction + tummy tuck
Abdomen - Significant fat in upper abdomen, lower abdomen, and back/flanks. - Abdominal wall laxity/widening. - Mild skin laxity with reduced tone and poor waist definition. Arms - Localized fat along the upper and lower arms. - No clear muscle contour; arms appear bulky and heavy. - Hard to wear fitted sleeves; redundant skin shows with movement.
Abdomen - Noticeably flatter abdomen with a smaller waist; slimmer torso. - Smoother, more harmonious waist–hip curve. - Skin surface tighter and even, without folds or irregularities. - Clean incisions with sutures removed; healing well, no seroma or significant bruising. Arms - Even debulking bilaterally; slimmer, elongated arm contour with clear definition. - Heavy appearance resolved on frontal and lateral views. - Small, discreet access sites; cosmetic impact minimal. - Recovery stable after liposuction and suture removal; no complications observed.
Patricia Holmes
Body-contouring liposuction — abdomen, waist, back, hips, inner thighs
- Generalized fat across abdomen, flanks, hips, and lower back; no defined curves. - Abdominal skin laxity with horizontal folds when upright. - Deep back rolls segmenting the posterior trunk. - Excess medial-thigh fat enlarging upper legs and disrupting limb balance. - Global loss of tone; older appearance; difficult to wear fitted garments.
- Abdomen flattened with a newly defined contour; large skin folds eliminated. - Waist notably reduced, creating a clear hourglass silhouette. - Back fat debulked; rolls resolved; no lateral bulges. - Abdominoplasty scar discreet and well placed, complementing the waist–hip line. - Inner thighs slimmer; legs appear longer and better proportioned. - Overall figure more youthful and firm; easier to wear body-hugging clothing or swimwear.
Katherine Lewis
Liposuction — abdomen, waist, back, hips, and inner thighs
- Generalized fat deposition in the abdomen, flanks, hips, and lower back; weak body curves. - Abdominal skin laxity with horizontal folds in upright posture. - Deep dorsal back rolls segmenting the back. - Excess medial-thigh fat causing bulky upper legs and poor limb balance. - Global loss of tone, older appearance, difficulty wearing fitted garments.
- Abdomen flattened and tightened; abdominal contour redefined. - Waist noticeably reduced with a clear hourglass silhouette. - Back rolls eliminated; posterior trunk smooth without lateral bulges. - Abdominal contouring incision discreet and well placed, supporting the waist–hip line. - Inner thighs slimmer; legs appear longer and better proportioned. - Overall figure more youthful and firm; easier fit for body-hugging clothing and swimwear.
James Peterson
Hair Transplant
- High forehead with shiny bald scalp. - Deep temporal recession; widened U-shaped frontal hairline. - No hair across mid-scalp and vertex. - Scalp fully visible with absent coverage. - Frontal hairline receded in an M-pattern extending toward the crown. - Vertex completely bald; mid-scalp denuded. - Only a thin occipital–parietal rim of donor hair remains.
- Dense, even coverage from hairline to crown with no scalp show. - Natural arched hairline design. Not overly square, yet retains masculine character. - Proportions balanced with the face; more youthful appearance. - High, uniform density from front to back without gaps. - Natural lift and growth direction; indistinguishable from native hair. - Seamless match to existing hair in color and texture. - Soft yet thick, strong shafts, indicating excellent technique and near-complete graft survival.
Thomas Reed
Hair Transplant
- Male-pattern hair loss, Norwood III–IV. - Receded frontal hairline with a high forehead; deep temporal recession. - Vertex with visible scalp; remaining hairs are thin and miniaturized. - Overall appearance older than stated age by ~7–10 years. - Top-down view shows an empty crown swirl.
- Dense, even coverage at the hairline and crown. - Soft, natural hairline design that suits the face; not overly square. - Complete coverage of all bald areas, including the crown, indicating high graft survival. - Direction and color match native hair; transplant is virtually undetectable. - Improved facial balance with a younger, more polished look.
Robert Hayes
Hair Transplant
- Advanced androgenetic alopecia: extensive loss at frontal scalp and vertex; hairline nearly absent. - Residual hair density very low, concentrated along the temporal–parietal rim. - Absent frontal frame elongates the face and ages the appearance.
- Frontal hairline reconstructed with a soft, masculine curve; even density without a rigid straight edge. - Vertex fully covered; no scalp show under direct light. - Uniform density without patchy areas. - Clear aesthetic gain: younger look and better facial balance with a defined hairline. - Graft growth follows natural direction and swirl; no upright or chaotic shafts.
William Grant
Hair Transplant
- Prior transplant: ~2,400 grafts to the frontal scalp at another clinic. - Graft mix: ~2,000 scalp grafts + ~400 beard grafts. - Mid-frontal beard-graft zone with poor survival, minimal growth. - Large interfollicular gaps and low density; unnatural appearance. - Patient dissatisfied and requests corrective work.
- Frontal zone fully covered with even, natural density. - Failed frontal work corrected; no visible gaps or step-offs. - New grafts show robust growth with proper direction and angulation; no kinked or upright hairs. - Hairline redesigned with balanced, sex-appropriate contour for the face. - Uniform cosmetic density achieved by 12–13 months.
Steven Harris
Hair Transplant
- Advanced androgenetic alopecia with near-total loss at the frontal, mid-scalp, and vertex. - Residual density very sparse, limited to temporal rims and occipital donor zone. - Shiny scalp surface, consistent with long-standing baldness and high graft requirement for coverage.
- Dense, even coverage; hairline soft and natural, not overly square. - Full coverage including the crown, indicating high graft survival. - Implanted hair matches native hair in color and growth direction, evidencing precise technique.

Customer Reviews

4.8
⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐
Google
Ethan Lee Ethan Lee
Visiting Aestheticsurgery was such a wonderful experience. Every detail, from the ambiance to the treatment, was perfect. I couldn’t be happier with my choice!
Thomas Thomas
I’ve tried many spas before, but Aestheticsurgery stands out! The service is impeccable, and the staff genuinely care about your experience. I’m so glad I found them.
Nancy Cly Nancy Cly
I can’t recommend Aestheticsurgery enough! The staff are so professional and caring. I’ve never had such a relaxing and satisfying spa experience anywhere else!
Jurairat Molina Jurairat Molina
Aestheticsurgery truly exceeded my expectations. The team made me feel comfortable and pampered from start to finish. I’m thrilled I chose them!

Doctor

Cosmetic Surgery Doctor – Seoul Center

DR. BUI LE QUY TUNG

  • Experience: 6+ years in aesthetic surgery
  • Procedures performed: Over 6,000 successful cosmetic surgeries
  • Graduated in Cosmetic Surgery: Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
  • Certificate in Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Orientation: Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine
DR. BUI LE QUY TUNG

Head of Aesthetic Surgery Department – Seoul Center

DR. NGUYEN KIM KHOA

  • Experience: Over 12 years in the cosmetic surgery field
  • Specialty: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery & Dermatology
  • Specialist Level II in Dermatology
  • Hanoi Medical University
  • Continuing Medical Education (CME) Certificates: Dermatology Hospital
DR. NGUYEN KIM KHOA